Home / Roborock S8 Pro Ultra vs Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni
Roborock
$1,400 - $1,600Ecovacs
$1,200 - $1,500The Ecovacs X2 Omni costs $1,500 (often on sale for $1,200) while the Roborock S8 Pro Ultra costs $1,600. The S8 Pro Ultra offers superior carpet cleaning with 6,000Pa suction and dual rubber brushes that avoid tangles, while the X2 Omni excels on hard floors with 8,000Pa suction and a square design for better corner cleaning.
AI Verdict
Choose the S8 Pro Ultra for mostly carpeted homes and the X2 Omni for mostly hard floors.
Ready to buy? Check prices in the comparison below ↓
Score Overview
Score comparison
Strengths & Weaknesses
Roborock S8 Pro Ultra
Roborock · $1,400 - $1,600
Strengths
+Dual rubber brush system excellent for carpet cleaning and avoiding tangles
+Ultra Dock with auto-emptying, mop washing, drying, and self-refilling capabilities
+Exceptional navigation with structured light and infrared sensors for privacy
+VibraRise 2.0 mopping system with automatic mop lifting on carpets
Weaknesses
−Average deep carpet cleaning performance and reduced airflow compared to predecessor
−Struggles with hair pickup, performing in sub-50% range on hair tests
−One of the priciest robot vacuums available with high ongoing costs
Ecovacs Deebot X2 Omni
Ecovacs · $1,200 - $1,500
Strengths
+Square design helps vacuum get closer to walls and corners more effectively
+Powerful 8,000Pa suction, among the strongest available
+Excellent debris removal performance (95.5% overall, 97.4% on hardwood)
+Comprehensive OMNI station with mop washing, hot air drying, and self-emptying
Weaknesses
−Not great with mopping edges and very expensive (though often discounted)
−Square design tends to get wedged in tight spaces
−Struggled in obstacle avoidance tests despite good overall navigation
Detailed Analysis
The S8 Pro Ultra performs slightly better on carpets despite lower 6,000Pa suction, thanks to its dual rubber brush system that untangles hair and debris more effectively than the X2's single roller. The dual roller system improves carpet cleaning performance over previous models.
The X2 Omni's dual rotating mopping pads are well-suited for tackling hard floors, while its square design provides better access to corners and edges. The X2 Omni outperformed the S8 Pro Ultra on hard floors (99.55% vs 96.9%) in testing.
The X2 Omni costs $1,500 (often on sale for $1,200) compared to the S8 Pro Ultra's $1,600 price point. Most homes will be well-served by either device, so consider choosing whichever is cheapest.
The S8 Pro Ultra's RockDock Ultra provides comprehensive maintenance including auto-emptying, mop washing, drying, and self-refilling capabilities. Both offer similar automation levels with self-refilling and self-drying features making them as hands-free as any system available.
The X2 Omni's square design helps it get closer to walls and corners better than round robots. Each mopping pad gets within 30mm closer to corners, and the 200mm roller brush boosts cleaning efficiency by 19%.
The S8 Pro Ultra's dual rubber brushes are excellent at avoiding tangles while keeping carpets clean, making it better for pet hair on carpets. However, the S8 Pro Ultra struggles with hair pickup overall, performing in the sub-50% range on hair tests.
Yes, both feature automatic mop lifting - the S8 Pro Ultra lifts 5mm and the X2 Omni lifts 15mm when detecting carpet.
The S8 Pro Ultra covers up to 1,200 square feet on a single charge, while the X2 Omni can run up to 200 minutes.
The X2 Omni has 8,000Pa suction compared to the S8 Pro Ultra's 6,000Pa, but the S8 Pro Ultra still performs slightly better overall due to its brush design.
Both offer automated cleaning routines that can go weeks without manual intervention thanks to their comprehensive docking stations.
This comparison was generated using AI-powered analysis of the latest specifications, reviews, and pricing data available on the web. Last updated: April 1, 2026. Results are for informational purposes — verify details before purchasing. Learn about our methodology
Want to compare different products?
Start a new comparison