Home / Samsung QN90D vs LG C4 OLED
Samsung
$1,399 - $7,999LG
$1,300 - $3,500Both are premium 65" TVs priced around $2,700, but serve different needs. Samsung QN90D reaches over 2,500 nits peak brightness—more than double the LG C4, making it ideal for bright rooms, while LG C4's OLED technology offers per-pixel control for true blacks and infinite contrast ratios.
AI Verdict
The QN90D excels in bright rooms with superior peak brightness, while the C4 delivers perfect blacks and cinematic quality for dark room viewing.
Ready to buy? Check prices in the comparison below ↓
Score Overview
Score comparison
Strengths & Weaknesses
Samsung QN90D Neo QLED
Samsung · $1,399 - $7,999
Strengths
+Exceptional peak brightness over 2,500 nits
+Anti-Reflective 3.0 coating reduces glare
+144Hz gaming support with low input lag
+No burn-in risk
Weaknesses
−Viewing angles suffer with color shifts
−No Dolby Vision support
−Minor color fringing on small text
LG C4 OLED evo
LG · $1,300 - $3,500
Strengths
+Perfect blacks with infinite contrast ratio
+Consistent image quality from all angles
+0.1ms response time and 144Hz refresh rate
+Dolby Vision HDR support
Weaknesses
−Lower peak brightness in bright rooms
−Potential burn-in risk with static images
−Smaller sizes have reduced brightness
Detailed Analysis
Samsung QN90D delivers over 2,500 nits peak brightness—more than double the LG C4. Its Anti-Reflective 3.0 coating further reduces glare for superior daytime viewing.
LG C4's OLED technology provides per-pixel control for true blacks and infinite contrast. HDR content appears more organic with smoother gradients and no blooming.
Both support 144Hz and have excellent gaming features, but C4 offers zero ghosting at 144Hz. QN90D shows minor ghosting but performs adequately for most users.
C4 maintains consistent image quality from all viewing angles. QN90D suffers from color and highlight shifts when viewed off-axis.
Samsung QN90D is immune to burn-in and resists image retention better. C4 has burn-in risk with static images despite protective algorithms.
Both are similarly priced around $2,700 for 65" models. QN90D delivers 90% of high-end experience for most scenarios, better for families and daytime use.
While LG includes protective algorithms, burn-in risk remains with static images like news channels or gaming HUDs.
Samsung QN90D delivers 90% of the high-end experience and excels in bright rooms where OLED would struggle.
C4's WebOS offers multi-view and dual PC monitor mode, while QN90D's Tizen lacks dual monitor features but includes auto HDR remastering.
Both offer four HDMI 2.1 inputs with 4K/144Hz gaming, VRR, and advanced gaming optimizations.
This comparison was generated using AI-powered analysis of the latest specifications, reviews, and pricing data available on the web. Last updated: April 1, 2026. Results are for informational purposes — verify details before purchasing. Learn about our methodology
Want to compare different products?
Start a new comparison